In the digital age, information is omnipresent and skills are as vital as knowledge. Where is the university in this context?
The paradox of higher education as an institution is that it can be an avenue for mobility and personal development, but we must also face the reality of its contribution to reinforcing social inequalities. In the race to democratize education and broaden curricula, intersectionality has not taken on the central relevance it should.
College education has come under scrutiny as it seems increasingly disconnected from the demands of the job market. It's like making a sandwich with everything you have in the fridge: it may be filling, but not necessarily tasty or nutritious. So what are the alternatives to higher education and what can universities do to respond to society's needs?
Oh, the great universities! Their long histories are punctuated with the rise and fall of many fields of study, of wise pioneers and the never-ending quest for knowledge. There was a time when going to college was a guarantee of a secure and well-paying job, an assured ticket to prosperity. You specialized in an area of knowledge, filled your gray matter with facts and theories, and presto! Life is done, or so it seemed. The reality is that university studies have been evolving, and not always in a positive way.
Before, the system was simple: the sciences, arts and humanities dominated. There were Newtons exploring gravity and Shakespeares writing plays. Scholars dedicated their lives to understanding a chosen field and then passed that knowledge on to their students, who, in turn, applied it to their professions. But the world we live in now is not so accommodating to this tradition. In our digital age, information is as ubiquitous as air, and skills are becoming as vital as knowledge.
The job market has moved from specific, specialized roles to a more fluid, multi-skilled environment. Today, a computer engineer also needs to know marketing; a doctor may need basic notions of AI. So where does this leave our beloved universities? Unfortunately, a bit in the dust. The traditional structure of most university studies is increasingly seen as rigid and disconnected from the realities of the globalized workforce. Students often leave university with a degree in hand and not fully prepared for the realities of the sectors in which they wish to develop.
The old university studies: revered, respected and increasingly... redundant. It's a bit like that old moth-eaten family heirloom that everyone is afraid to throw away, but that no one quite knows why we still keep. Before the academic aficionados come out to chase us with picks and doctoral theses in hand, let's get a little perspective.
Just like fashion, technology, food preferences, and TikTok dance trends, the job market is also evolving. Today, employers want to see more than just a degree; they want practical skills, adaptability, innovativeness, emotional intelligence, and the list goes on. They're more interested in what you can do than what you can do. It's like saying, "So you know all the rules of soccer, but do you know how to really play the game?"
The truth is that technology companies such as Google, Apple and IBM no longer require their employees to have a college degree. It seems that skills are increasingly more valuable than diplomas. Well, that makes sense: we've never heard of a catastrophic system failure being fixed by waving a diploma at a server, unless, of course, it's a degree in computer science or something related.
Don't get us wrong, no one denies the charm of ivy-covered buildings and late-night philosophical debates over cheap beer and pizza. But, in today's hyperdynamic job market, the practical relevance of traditional university studies seems hard to defend.
At this point, we assume you want hard numbers to back it up, right? After all, we live in the age of data. Let's talk about the underemployment of those fresh out of college. According to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, the underemployment rate for recent graduates in the United States hovers around 41%. That means that nearly half of the people coming out of college with new degrees are stuck in jobs that don't require them.
Oh, and did we mention the captivating saga of student loan debt? Reports show that the average student debt in the United States is $37,584 per borrower. That kind of money can buy a lot of pizza and beer.
If you're a student, we're not saying you should give up on your dreams of a college degree or graduate degree faster than a bad first date. Everyone's path is unique, and for some, a college education is still the ideal path. But statistics suggest a shift in relevance, especially when you consider that, according to a CareerBuilder survey, 65% of jobs require specialized skills that you can acquire outside of a traditional four-year degree program.
Now, if you live in a country where college is free, lucky you! Beyond what today's job market demands of graduates, there is an elephant in the room that we have yet to address: the higher education system perpetuates systemic oppression. Let's look at how and why.
Let's go all the way back to ancient times, when higher education had much less to do with Saturday night drinking binges and more to do with philosophical talks in the agora. You see, in those dusty old days, folks like sweet Socrates and his crew were enthusiastic advocates of the old "knowledge is power" mantra. The problem was that they were also enthusiastic about keeping that power in the hands of a small elite. Same old story, right?
Fast forward a few (hundred) years and medieval universities were no better. Picture this: a bunch of middle-aged monks huddled over scrolls, guarding sacred knowledge like a Gollum with a precious ring. Education was (is?) a privilege, not a right, reserved exclusively for the wealthy and well-connected. And guess who wasn't wealthy and well-connected? Anyone who wasn't a white, predominantly Christian, wealthy male.
Eventually, things began to change. Women and racialized people fought tooth and nail, elbows and knees, to fight their way into the ivory tower. But let's not get nostalgic: the game was still rigged. As access to education became more widespread, so did the systemic barriers that kept marginalized people in this position. Higher education may have opened its doors a little wider, but the path to them is still strewn with prejudice, stereotypes and discrimination.
Let's face it: higher education is still geared to the privileged few and the "physically fit." Barriers remain high and robust for the disabled and neurodivergent. And, unfortunately, this preference for those without disabilities is woven into the fabric of our educational culture, contributing to a legacy of ableism.
The 20th century brought changes, with the rise of disability rights and accessibility movements. However, the structure of our higher education system, rooted in centuries of tradition, continued to harbor ableist practices and policies. Fixed schedules, rigid physical spaces, standardized testing, the absence of accommodations such as sign language interpreters or alternative formats for learning, in addition to one-size-fits-all teaching methods, are just a few examples of ableism in academia. Speaking of teaching methods and systemic oppression, what exactly do universities teach?
Higher education curricula, especially in Western and Global North countries, have a long tradition of marginalizing non-white, non-cisgender, non-disabled, non-male voices. It is the academic equivalent of a 1990s boy band concert: dominated by white, thin, cisgender males.
The bibliography of most college textbooks reads like a list of attendees at a privileged white male convention: names like Kant, Freud, Shakespeare, and Darwin take center stage, leaving little room for diverse voices. This systemic imbalance goes beyond mere lack of representation. It shapes the way knowledge is shared and understood, reinforcing a single perspective that continues to privilege one group over another.
Almost every curriculum maintains the same old power dynamics and narratives, marginalizing the voices of the global south, queer and racialized people. In essence, it is a perpetuation of systemic oppression wrapped in a façade of intellectual discourse.
So, are we in a postcolonial and postmodern world in which diverse voices are heard? The answer is a resounding "no" from academia. Until higher education curricula abandon the cisgender white male fan club and embrace diversity, we are doomed to keep singing the same old boring song. Or is there an alternative?
When we talk about breaking the mold, we usually mean challenging the status quo, going beyond traditional ideas and forging our own path. In education, this means exploring alternative avenues of learning beyond standard classroom education. There is a growing need to explore these alternative paths, not as a last resort, but as viable and valid options for success. The traditional school system, while effective for some, may not work best for all. The inherent diversity of learners demands a variety of pedagogical approaches that offer choices about how, when and where learning takes place. And this is where alternative pathways to educational success come into play.
Traditionally, the educational landscape has been dominated by a monolithic model of learning, where students are taught the same curriculum, in the same way and at the same pace. The learning styles, interests and aspirations of individual learners have often not been taken into account. In contrast, alternative education pathways offer a more personalized, inclusive and flexible approach to learning. They encompass a wide range of non-traditional learning methods, from homeschooling and online learning to vocational training and community colleges. These pathways not only provide a tailored learning experience, but also equip students with the practical skills needed for their future careers.
This paradigm shift in education is based on the concept of "Universal Design for Learning" (UDL). This principle postulates that educational environments and curricula should be flexible and adaptable to accommodate individual learning differences. By leveraging the principles of UAL, alternative pathways to higher education offer students the opportunity to study in ways that match their interests, abilities, and career goals. They aim to ensure that educational success is not limited to a single traditional pathway, but is accessible through multiple pathways tailored to the diverse needs of students.
Traditional education has its merits, but it is not without its flaws. The predominant "one-size-fits-all" approach has often resulted in learning gaps, where some students excel while others struggle. The current system also places heavy emphasis on grades and test scores as the primary indicators of academic success. This narrow measurement overlooks other important factors such as creativity, critical thinking and practical skills. In addition, traditional education often neglects students' individual interests and talents, focusing instead on a standardized curriculum that does not necessarily match a student's career aspirations or prepare him or her for the future.
When we delve deeper into the benefits of alternative pathways to success, we discover a more holistic approach to education. These methods provide individualized learning experiences that are tailored to the unique strengths and interests of the learner. This is achieved through concrete, hands-on experiences that translate theory into practice, making learning more relevant and engaging. Above all, these alternative pathways allow for great flexibility and personalization: students can study at their own pace, at convenient times and even from the comfort of their own homes.
Numerous alternative paths to success in education are often overlooked. For example, vocational training, which provides practical, career-specific knowledge that is in high demand in today's job market. Another alternative is online and distance learning, which offers a range of courses and degrees accessible to anyone, anywhere in the world. On the other hand, we also have homeschooling and unschooling options, which provide a flexible, child-directed learning environment. Community colleges and trade schools also offer a more affordable, career-focused education than traditional universities.
There is no shortage of success stories of people who have broken the mold. From white male figures like Thomas Edison and Albert Einstein and billionaires like Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, they all took non-traditional paths to access education. In our Global South communities, we can also find numerous examples of people who have successfully pursued alternative paths such as homeschooling, online learning or vocational training. These stories are powerful testimony that traditional education is not the only path to success.
Despite the multiplicity of success stories, alternative pathways are often met with stigma and misconception. Many believe they are inferior to traditional education or limit career prospects. In addition, there is enormous social pressure to conform to the conventional pathway, making it difficult for people to pursue alternative paths. Added to this is the lack of resources and support for those who wish to venture off the beaten path of education.
Overcoming these challenges requires a cultural shift in our perception of education. We need to champion alternative pathways, dispel misconceptions and highlight their advantages. It is imperative to build a strong community and support system for people pursuing these paths. Most importantly, finding mentors and role models can be instrumental in guiding people along the path they choose, giving them first-hand insights and instilling a sense of confidence and belonging.
If you are thinking about pursuing an alternative educational path, there are a few things to keep in mind. Start by reflecting on yourself: identify your interests, strengths and career goals. Research and explore the different options available to you. Think about your learning style and needs - do you thrive in a structured, face-to-face environment or do you prefer a more flexible, self-paced approach? Compare the pros and cons of each option and make an informed decision.
In conclusion...
The emphasis on skills over degrees can democratize access to good jobs. It is an opportunity for those who do not have the financial means to afford a university education. Moreover, with the advent of online learning platforms, acquiring new skills has never been easier, but the challenge now is to ensure access for everyone, regardless of income . Contemporary movements advocate for more inclusive and equitable education systems to correct the sins of the past.
The declining relevance of university studies presents an opportunity for educators and students alike. An opportunity to reinvent education, to align it more closely with the skills and knowledge needed to succeed in the 21st century. An opportunity to make learning more practical, real, accessible, intersectional and enriching.
Alternative paths to success in education hold great potential for nurturing individual talent and preparing graduates for the careers of the future. It's time to think outside the box and break the mold. Let's embrace the diversity of learning styles and give everyone an equal opportunity to succeed in education. To build a future where education is truly inclusive and accessible, we need to champion alternative pathways and encourage others to do the same.
At the end of the day, it is high time we restructured our curricula, remixed our bibliographies and created a more harmonious and inclusive landscape of voices. Knowledge has no boundaries. Let us not allow the linear, patriarchal, Eurocentric narrative to limit it. It is 2023 and academia has some catching up to do. If you are a student, be the change you want to see at your university. At the end of the day, all knowledge is valid and important; it is time for our universities to reflect that.
If you would like to learn how to have these kinds of difficult conversations with your colleagues to transform their organizational culture, check out our workshop on difficult conversations and our self-paced online course for organizations. Fill out this form and we'll be with you every step of the way!
Edited by
.svg)
Let's transform our perception of failure and use it as a catalyst for growth.
.png)
.jpg)
.png)
.png)
.jpg)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
.avif)
