Chances are, you've heard "Bitter Sweet Symphony" by the Verve.

‍

Whether it was because you listened to music in the 90s or saw a Nike ad, “Bittersweet Symphony” absolutely shattered worldwide records in 1997. But did you know that The Verve were stripped of their ownership of the song and don’t even earn a single penny in royalties?

‍

The bottom line? Copyright law is incredibly complex.

‍

It’s not immediately obvious, since the band layered nearly 50 tracks of instrumentation, but “Bittersweet Symphony” uses a five-note sample from the orchestral version of “The Last Time” by The Rolling Stones.

‍

Now, The Verve negotiated a license to use the 5-note sample, but when the track became a smash hit, former Stones manager Allen Klein (who owns the copyright to the band’s pre-1970s songs) decided he was going to be a little (read: a lot) overzealous, and decided to sue the band, claiming that The Verve broke the agreement when they “supposedly” used a larger part of the song than what was negotiated in the license—something The Verve still vehemently disputes.

‍

Rather than risking an expensive legal battle that might not go their way, the band decided to settle out of court and handed over 100% of the songwriting royalties.

‍

What’s worse is that “Bittersweet Symphony” was nominated for a Grammy in the Best Song category, but since that category honors songwriters—and Klein now held the songwriting credits—the Grammy nomination actually went to Mick Jagger and Keith Richards.

‍

Oof.

Not only did The Verve not receive any money for the song, but they also no longer received official recognition for creating a chart-topping hit.

‍

To quote the song…

‍

“’Cause life is a bittersweet symphony”

‍

"Trying to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, and then you die..."

‍

Did Klein go too far? Did The Verve actually commit a copyright violation? Listen to the tracks above so you can decide for yourself.